{"id":"W3029925054","doi":"10.1016/j.cotox.2020.05.003","title":"Benefit versus risk associated with the use of brominated flame retardants","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Opinion in Toxicology","topic":"Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"American Chemistry Council","keywords":"Tetrabromobisphenol A; Fire retardant; Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene; Brominated flame retardant; Biomonitoring; Risk assessment; Environmental science; Forensic engineering; Environmental chemistry; Toxicology; Chemistry; Engineering; Computer science; Computer security; Organic chemistry; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002045648,0.000164597,0.0002517824,0.00003194092,0.00006245558,0.00001338655,0.0003457875,0.0001073326,0.001068485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009374288,0.0001151886,0.00004349959,0.0005915256,0.0003452724,0.0001614113,0.0001976869,0.0003668653,0.0001053682],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000226862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003104133,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003858151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001753759,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985383,0.000227695,0.0002883799,0.0003185386,0.0002689694,0.0003581341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989233,0.0004168001,0.0002878716,0.0002443779,0.000003941835,0.000123682],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004051185,0.001647991,0.5071642,0.00005389554,0.0003982132,0.00001830669,0.0102632,0.01267176,0.02776669,0.000187061,0.04288258,0.3928949],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002782185,0.0009462578,0.9746452,0.00004886526,0.00003086641,0.000002763523,0.00008203772,0.005494005,0.001323048,0.00003868387,0.01437241,0.0002336895],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962135,0.0001133,0.00008464712,0.001624041,0.001302517,0.0003247236,0.0001982875,0.00004199013,0.00009699898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996326,0.0001337038,0.00005812683,0.00008132595,0.00004456551,0.000006521097,0.000006730968,0.00001731428,0.00001909391],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4674809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998447,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09944352807478772,"score_gpt":0.2989060091222631,"score_spread":0.1994624810474753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}