{"id":"W3031537811","doi":"10.1016/j.geb.2020.04.017","title":"A simple proof of strong duality in the linear persuasion problem","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Games and Economic Behavior","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Duality (order theory); Simple (philosophy); Duality gap; Stochastic dominance; Mathematics; Persuasion; Mathematical economics; Dual (grammatical number); Argument (complex analysis); Strong duality; Mathematical optimization; Optimization problem; Discrete mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007537318,0.00005032035,0.0001249811,0.00002433741,0.00005585343,0.00003476207,0.000206513,0.00002776148,0.0003218588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003811795,0.0000324124,0.00004082481,0.00008178943,0.00007686576,0.0001088236,0.00005088453,0.00006693493,0.00003092141],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007519272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001970906,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000394573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003355223,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992564,0.00006492573,0.0003262719,0.0002016628,0.00007477801,0.00007596889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995348,0.0001161387,0.0001219127,0.0001744465,0.00001483386,0.0000378599],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001720815,0.0005227349,0.4725963,0.00003302877,0.0000152238,0.000003407868,0.02676588,0.002230864,0.001712041,0.09766622,0.005679615,0.3926027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002318623,0.0006534897,0.6774705,0.00002262902,0.0001130138,0.00003140608,0.08247928,0.0206497,0.006365408,0.06174522,0.1474831,0.0006676114],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.996763,0.00002413184,0.0005420563,0.001759486,0.00001609741,0.0002568023,0.00003578895,0.000005435214,0.000597194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995543,0.000003644471,0.000150917,0.0001158082,0.00003715557,0.00005033612,0.00000272712,0.000002552211,0.0000825553],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.391935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3524128,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1471616948982792,"score_gpt":0.3831455481436001,"score_spread":0.235983853245321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}