{"id":"W303161768","doi":"10.5957/jsp.2008.24.4.221","title":"A Computer Simulation Approach to Improving Tugboat Shipbuilding Design and Development Productivity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ship Production","topic":"BIM and Construction Integration","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Shipbuilding; Shipyard; Vendor; Naval architecture; Piping; Manufacturing engineering; Productivity; Engineering; Process (computing); Operations research; Computer science; Engineering drawing; Marine engineering; Mechanical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005377664,0.0001139194,0.0001446758,0.0002202044,0.0001377515,0.00003392963,0.00004922934,0.0000513049,0.000001730808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006312635,0.0001028196,0.0000234912,0.0001889825,0.00002493119,0.0005533508,0.00001109147,0.0001975059,0.000002178376],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001371445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004836102,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":8.779168e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.538564e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991491,0.00004688113,0.0003273897,0.0001572448,0.0001996152,0.0001197793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995208,0.00001801536,0.0001095362,0.00008179416,0.0002016264,0.00006816965],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000490096,0.00003678117,0.0008874236,0.00006003643,0.00002960651,0.000001176825,0.002162362,0.782101,0.01549566,0.00003314248,0.000293183,0.1988506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001226285,0.000536986,0.08080357,0.0002949581,0.00009296785,0.004776698,0.0006649262,0.6155975,0.2851432,0.0004194966,0.009305323,0.001138072],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4437515,0.00007606357,0.5551627,0.00005691355,0.0007485075,0.0001391936,6.09675e-8,0.00003806692,0.00002704984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8165571,0.000007802512,0.1825915,0.00000866917,0.0007935198,0.000005560634,5.090809e-7,0.00001267565,0.00002265772],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3728057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.419286,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03919690532133227,"score_gpt":0.2207402117235713,"score_spread":0.181543306402239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}