{"id":"W3032041294","doi":"10.1177/0170840620934063","title":"Speaking about vision, talking in the name of so much more: A methodological framework for ventriloquial analyses in organization studies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Organization Studies","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Vision; Conceptualization; Sociology; Organization studies; TRACE (psycholinguistics); Epistemology; Constitution; Perspective (graphical); Order (exchange); Knowledge management; Organizational communication; Linguistics; Computer science; Social science; Political science; Business; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007683061,0.000266225,0.0006348133,0.0002839666,0.00046105,0.0001677638,0.0003470414,0.00008095395,0.00008911383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01903769,0.0001936281,0.00005478482,0.005249828,0.0001862364,0.0005434166,0.0005207412,0.000135336,0.00001895681],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006209242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001822384,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003308757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006982719,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980956,0.00008226197,0.0007110337,0.000418884,0.0004258014,0.0002663744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972075,0.0008579502,0.0004930587,0.0001533385,0.001279432,0.000008712061],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001368065,0.0003981175,0.7645527,0.002284232,0.001030565,0.00002898794,0.04966229,0.003926107,0.001190587,0.1611949,0.01274308,0.002851673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003884793,0.0001685527,0.6567914,0.001124652,0.00114069,0.000002886273,0.248611,0.001779148,0.002418168,0.06836104,0.01416943,0.001548238],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.764373,0.02289265,0.1558668,0.05232349,0.001056968,0.002750417,0.00001333875,0.0003937138,0.0003296754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894461,0.001119309,0.004678651,0.003798327,0.0008230821,0.00002250626,0.00005782947,0.00004575261,0.000008444209],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2250731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9892254,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2001401471818864,"score_gpt":0.4199783943691506,"score_spread":0.2198382471872642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}