{"id":"W3033377645","doi":"10.1096/fasebj.31.1_supplement.lb386","title":"Environmental Impacts of Mixed Dishes: A Case Study on Pizza","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The FASEB Journal","topic":"Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Carbon footprint; Life-cycle assessment; Consumption (sociology); Food group; Food consumption; Environmental science; Ecological footprint; Resource (disambiguation); Agricultural science; Portion size; Food science; Business; Mathematics; Agricultural economics; Computer science; Greenhouse gas; Environmental health; Sustainability; Economics; Chemistry; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004718067,0.00007272018,0.0001010185,0.000005211426,0.0009342055,0.0001052139,0.0002605321,0.00002237888,0.0001216896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007492235,0.00001919457,0.0000889305,0.0000230846,0.0001384806,0.00009949171,0.00006015059,0.0001590899,0.000004343677],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003432963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006723914,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002195816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001406089,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992991,0.0001474639,0.0001479839,0.00008844828,0.0001777947,0.0001392164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995446,0.00005893571,0.0001746282,0.0001132138,0.00001423941,0.00009436098],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000322878,0.002277768,0.2842752,0.000005445578,0.0001111775,0.001440506,0.003276961,0.00001476713,0.4443691,0.00002496565,0.0003264204,0.2635548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003168394,0.001522298,0.7919254,0.000007415336,0.00002065025,0.00249628,0.192919,0.000007057179,0.01043993,0.0001825398,0.00008123236,0.0000813817],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986788,0.00002297754,1.637386e-7,0.0008585443,0.000145092,0.0001402565,0.00001029787,0.000004343119,0.0001394928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997042,0.000008626804,0.000001467542,0.00001905906,0.0001666835,0.000001418587,4.337008e-7,4.095441e-7,0.00009764123],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5076502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7185248,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03001082285148053,"score_gpt":0.2608084015632064,"score_spread":0.2307975787117259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}