{"id":"W3033377645","doi":"10.1096/fasebj.31.1_supplement.lb386","title":"Environmental Impacts of Mixed Dishes: A Case Study on Pizza","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The FASEB Journal","topic":"Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Carbon footprint; Life-cycle assessment; Consumption (sociology); Food group; Food consumption; Environmental science; Ecological footprint; Resource (disambiguation); Agricultural science; Portion size; Food science; Business; Mathematics; Agricultural economics; Computer science; Greenhouse gas; Environmental health; Sustainability; Economics; Chemistry; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002062814,0.0007319082,0.0004442181,0.001629006,0.00189932,0.001809442,0.001070518,0.001429807,0.00324618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003603875,0.0002840442,0.001357379,0.004115699,0.001320995,0.001817851,0.001953791,0.001131378,0.0005385589],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002157952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009591934,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04679918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09565514,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998719,0.0005775256,0.00005462985,0.0001803183,0.0002884745,0.0001801049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973469,0.001483172,0.0002781632,0.0003076198,0.000406541,0.0001775716],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002016587,0.002198621,0.6355627,0.002048295,0.001064635,0.05243002,0.02056493,0.04966692,0.01361442,0.02180187,0.02163357,0.1773974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001668157,0.001325793,0.6262733,0.000970535,0.0009395778,0.01009692,0.08159414,0.07213402,0.01703751,0.0189901,0.1701111,0.0003602273],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9722725,0.0008015795,0.007896065,0.001528594,0.00004983834,0.0002107132,0.002366986,0.0001046487,0.01476911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9593523,0.001727682,0.02747135,0.0005754362,0.00005166366,0.0002052468,0.003029266,0.0001286925,0.007458328],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04679918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09305358,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03001082285148053,"score_gpt":0.2608084015632064,"score_spread":0.2307975787117259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}