{"id":"W3033741338","doi":"10.5539/ells.v10n2p85","title":"A Contrastive Analysis of Interpersonal Function Between the Chinese and English Versions of The Sight of Father’s Back","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English Language and Literature Studies","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Social Science Fund of China","keywords":"Politeness; Modal verb; Sight; Modality (human–computer interaction); Psychology; Linguistics; Interrogative; Value (mathematics); Modal; Interpersonal communication; Interpretation (philosophy); Mood; Contrastive analysis; Social psychology; Computer science; Philosophy; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005247636,0.0002496266,0.000148984,0.001142778,0.0008517113,0.0009383864,0.0001839366,0.0001625165,0.002664652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003156083,0.00008179514,0.0001952973,0.0008148999,0.001534673,0.0009722386,0.0008636856,0.0005008851,0.0001284605],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008702045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003424245,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006290433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008183144,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996517,0.0001318964,0.00002383205,0.00005250269,0.00008759036,0.00005248823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998703,0.0006615287,0.0001855598,0.0001033529,0.0002664831,0.00008010917],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001866049,0.0002345828,0.1345467,0.0007404402,0.0001742813,0.002918303,0.6097556,0.0002210937,0.1347546,0.03627713,0.00190871,0.0766025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003995287,0.0002921073,0.8163821,0.00009309904,0.000123506,0.0008417623,0.159052,0.001051631,0.01008998,0.002597921,0.009368448,0.0000675507],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897848,0.00007548376,0.0003157548,0.00004628328,0.000009442749,0.00000909487,0.0000511099,0.000003063282,0.009705062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988913,0.00002944191,0.0001793074,0.00001733151,0.000005420835,0.000009871928,0.00005919865,0.000005518655,0.0008025267],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006290433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01250762,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01073205076894413,"score_gpt":0.269319753504642,"score_spread":0.2585877027356979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}