{"id":"W3033862776","doi":"10.1016/s2666-5247(20)30038-0","title":"Reconsidering Mycobacterium bovis as a proxy for zoonotic tuberculosis: a molecular epidemiological surveillance study","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Lancet Microbe","topic":"Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology","field":"Medicine","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; McGill University Health Centre","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Tuberculosis; Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex; Mycobacterium bovis; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Population; Biology; Molecular epidemiology; Veterinary medicine; Virology; Microbiology; Medicine; Genotype; Genetics; Environmental health; Gene; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002145841,0.0002943884,0.001271022,0.00004308655,0.0001404527,0.00003317379,0.0004812201,0.0001382231,0.0001179309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01032474,0.000162854,0.0002751702,0.0002419687,0.0001488716,0.00004877595,0.0003609917,0.0005710687,0.0002135541],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006357086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009828174,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006910112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002919193,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99685,0.0008494646,0.0005668508,0.0006509406,0.0001564008,0.0009263942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974381,0.001134064,0.0001278858,0.0008373508,0.0001322295,0.0003303977],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005983409,0.000695578,0.5504047,0.0008460134,0.001657956,0.0004227553,0.003252321,0.0001486085,0.3178198,0.0003366779,0.1145335,0.003898734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02576186,0.01965825,0.5686528,0.0005489801,0.001077458,0.001831639,0.004871664,0.01317749,0.02722574,0.00614334,0.3286861,0.002364657],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8231924,0.0009035378,0.0004087639,0.1727134,0.00008343151,0.002171453,0.00003298634,0.0001607475,0.0003333373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9537746,0.0002822015,0.002097361,0.04251288,0.0007897784,0.0003935107,0.00003562023,0.00004316138,0.00007086679],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2905941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980117,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1109834576256998,"score_gpt":0.3483786163886948,"score_spread":0.237395158762995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}