{"id":"W3033881011","doi":"10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.05.038","title":"Identifying flow defects in amorphous alloys using machine learning outlier detection methods","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scripta Materialia","topic":"Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys","field":"Engineering","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Materials science; Amorphous metal; Outlier; Anomaly detection; Amorphous solid; Shear matrix; Plasticity; Transient (computer programming); Shear (geology); Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Computer science; Metallurgy; Composite material; Alloy; Crystallography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003942716,0.0004175434,0.0004052687,0.002297299,0.0002709035,0.0006875313,0.000629539,0.0006312329,0.0006543279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00183586,0.0001824612,0.0003609238,0.0009198183,0.0003293065,0.0006429232,0.0003697849,0.0005438951,0.0002089859],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003251766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003356089,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001920402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001941078,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997573,0.0000211926,0.00001821235,0.00006703121,0.0001035368,0.00003265252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998876,0.0003481291,0.0003283563,0.0001129237,0.0002864993,0.00004801626],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001230232,0.0005761608,0.1012123,0.0004701243,0.000177178,0.001253157,0.0003345613,0.2493786,0.2053596,0.009418393,0.004767228,0.4258225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001102044,0.0001114835,0.008249123,0.00001583578,0.00001673142,0.0002397672,0.00005883918,0.9543952,0.03292967,0.002898945,0.00105255,0.00002094028],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.6294401,0.0007243784,0.3641723,0.0001987367,0.0001341758,0.00006279315,0.0005115001,0.003211041,0.001545014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9502755,0.0001573714,0.04828255,0.00001748878,0.00002916965,0.00001985999,0.000424388,0.00009843508,0.0006953254],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002297299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003818452,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05110213234928151,"score_gpt":0.2796289402559626,"score_spread":0.2285268079066811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}