{"id":"W3034123046","doi":"10.1007/s10479-020-03667-9","title":"A new inverse DEA cost efficiency model for estimating potential merger gains: a case of Canadian banks","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Operations Research","topic":"Efficiency Analysis Using DEA","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Data envelopment analysis; Restructuring; Cost efficiency; Mergers and acquisitions; Efficiency; Industrial organization; Inverse; Computer science; Economics; Econometrics; Operational efficiency; Operations research; Mathematical optimization; Finance; Mathematics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006081755,0.0001259558,0.0003522372,0.002003917,0.0007503182,0.000259992,0.0008884708,0.0000934768,0.0003242521],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01936851,0.0001065719,0.000216244,0.005337822,0.0002593492,0.0003858757,0.0001477859,0.000249966,0.00006134489],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002949458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002921251,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09185468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1386813,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9961898,0.0003657394,0.0009632908,0.0005289089,0.001389682,0.0005625882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937767,0.0007739086,0.0001005996,0.0005984453,0.004117687,0.000632663],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002163771,0.00005209911,0.00002333353,0.00001032284,0.00002058512,0.00003668784,0.003082033,0.9503102,0.003398862,0.001612225,0.03499695,0.006435093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002070213,0.0001265501,0.00001054411,0.00001736539,0.00001240981,0.00001267745,0.000952432,0.9958854,0.001703573,0.0004764604,0.0004965997,0.00009901116],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3668916,0.0001266593,0.6068343,0.02402836,0.00006809559,0.0008892319,0.0002546534,0.00001366993,0.000893497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9318385,0.00001031379,0.06687302,0.0004589568,0.00006924995,0.00002798197,0.00001246931,0.00001344226,0.0006961299],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5649469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9888918,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6036382136610892,"score_gpt":0.5492192108670334,"score_spread":0.05441900279405576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}