{"id":"W3035506578","doi":"10.1016/j.cancergen.2020.04.016","title":"12. Genetic evaluation of CLL using SNP-array CGH: Comparison with retrospective FISH data in our institution.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cancer Genetics","topic":"Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Sanger sequencing; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Chronic lymphocytic leukemia; Fluorescence in situ hybridization; Biology; Comparative genomic hybridization; Karyotype; SNP array; DNA sequencing; SNP; Genetics; Computational biology; Leukemia; Single-nucleotide polymorphism; Chromosome; Gene; Genotype; Fishery","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002475107,0.0002380514,0.0001557478,0.002282515,0.0004905608,0.0004405074,0.0004395259,0.000837708,0.002969722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007298123,0.0001765626,0.0002662346,0.001816588,0.0003564713,0.0003835325,0.0004708657,0.0002732211,0.0009562129],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007523689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007938663,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02200347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02410302,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999078,0.0002496067,0.0001535117,0.000125233,0.0002222338,0.0001713275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956749,0.001439039,0.0007881045,0.0004521717,0.001214819,0.0004309373],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005880528,0.00005766972,0.972042,0.00002477441,0.00003610267,0.0009113023,0.0001294374,0.0004298269,0.006285813,0.0001495454,0.002353737,0.0169918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003263403,0.0001950341,0.9903986,0.00001934214,0.00006791936,0.001604088,0.0002696692,0.000676646,0.004126062,0.0001241993,0.002468719,0.00001712361],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9793687,0.0008836705,0.003139762,0.001400452,0.00008244828,0.00009535089,0.005562761,0.0002228221,0.009243982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919836,0.0003119919,0.003492096,0.0004384694,0.00004264247,0.0000730852,0.002006876,0.00005560342,0.001595752],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02200347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04375082,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2586739903773015,"score_gpt":0.4400683913941391,"score_spread":0.1813944010168376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}