{"id":"W3036094632","doi":"10.1080/13218719.2020.1767719","title":"Critical considerations in the development and interpretation of common risk language","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychiatry Psychology and Law","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Risk analysis (engineering); Interpretation (philosophy); Risk assessment; Criminal justice; Computer science; Conceptual framework; Economic Justice; Management science; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Computer security; Sociology; Business; Political science; Engineering; Criminology; Law; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.4316442,0.002087028,0.003823061,0.01250831,0.01260925,0.02972639,0.01646509,0.01164277,0.003367244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5255743,0.002448889,0.00253403,0.005891641,0.06985532,0.04105008,0.01831308,0.03334409,0.001778405],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01712103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04933406,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01264344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01144727,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5206923,0.3755629,0.04731529,0.008967588,0.04304257,0.004419302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3475088,0.5139418,0.01698925,0.02774793,0.09000523,0.003807066],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008568579,0.00006069522,0.001582615,0.002087907,0.00006653897,0.0007077031,0.07349857,0.000605029,0.0006420254,0.8005731,0.02760397,0.09248624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006085748,0.0001316543,0.002121306,0.01141764,0.0001215072,0.001885272,0.06266888,0.003590174,0.001420287,0.6690086,0.2471583,0.0004155844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.009475741,0.03602895,0.3713331,0.5346239,0.009910366,0.001825542,0.0002700693,0.0005877845,0.0359445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1839013,0.01491983,0.7192877,0.06528608,0.005838658,0.004869237,0.0002565334,0.0007441094,0.004896436],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4316442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7008839,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02826495839868165,"score_gpt":0.3552035481040314,"score_spread":0.3269385897053498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}