{"id":"W3036094632","doi":"10.1080/13218719.2020.1767719","title":"Critical considerations in the development and interpretation of common risk language","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychiatry Psychology and Law","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Risk analysis (engineering); Interpretation (philosophy); Risk assessment; Criminal justice; Computer science; Conceptual framework; Economic Justice; Management science; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Computer security; Sociology; Business; Political science; Engineering; Criminology; Law; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005710517,0.0002127654,0.0003243607,0.00009388867,0.0001870853,0.00003144019,0.0001742759,0.0001864237,0.0001757044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009941718,0.0001757148,0.0000448296,0.0002048845,0.0005569648,0.0001046731,0.00003612787,0.0005122375,0.00003452649],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005564857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002406484,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006425843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000832952,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979277,0.0005463897,0.0006045662,0.000494574,0.0001306251,0.0002961945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988214,0.0005425456,0.0001665591,0.0003290116,0.00002520979,0.0001153002],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005103112,0.0007222171,0.1247661,0.0001001266,0.0001511079,0.00002817236,0.1027881,0.000002512017,0.0001296213,0.7212116,0.03486634,0.01472382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00611939,0.001585273,0.8457012,0.0001789147,0.0002293338,0.0005777813,0.03728376,0.0002906739,0.00004432768,0.09003058,0.01705374,0.0009050202],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8842039,0.006644695,0.001051101,0.0219415,0.01615172,0.0004449351,0.00004070867,0.00006632366,0.06945512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819093,0.00002017203,0.00373815,0.01394459,0.0003098761,0.00004095621,0.00001063257,0.00001930188,0.000006967831],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7209351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.716544,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02826495839868165,"score_gpt":0.3552035481040314,"score_spread":0.3269385897053498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}