{"id":"W3036616452","doi":"10.1139/cjfas-2019-0327","title":"Impact of in-stream restoration structures on salmonid abundance and biomass: an updated meta-analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Biomass (ecology); Environmental science; Ecology; Relative species abundance; Population; Stream restoration; Population structure; Restoration ecology; Biology; Fishery; Habitat; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01857578,0.002348017,0.0071472,0.005122674,0.0006454228,0.00256918,0.0022948,0.001590381,0.00425075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03143703,0.001306435,0.03536458,0.005498049,0.0005930665,0.001545906,0.001571932,0.002226503,0.000488012],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001278272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00195284,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01460027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02969199,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9903177,0.005012232,0.001647736,0.001983789,0.0006643356,0.0003742901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9775566,0.01665035,0.001770005,0.002192753,0.001482973,0.0003472338],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001382069,0.00003962793,0.04167322,0.03807881,0.900796,0.0003327127,0.0001542092,0.002049576,0.0009440246,0.0002981767,0.002364397,0.01188709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002384535,0.000136793,0.02007958,0.002856204,0.9725174,0.0001329792,0.00006978255,0.0008579803,0.0002482571,0.0003306364,0.002496404,0.00003556596],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1162397,0.8542368,0.01124892,0.002188841,0.0008464972,0.0002874483,0.01257154,0.0004887691,0.00189149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9159611,0.06789847,0.008996249,0.001415201,0.0002619857,0.0003990411,0.004055929,0.0002393807,0.0007727418],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01857578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09823924,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04224450578534854,"score_gpt":0.2630931257087615,"score_spread":0.2208486199234129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}