{"id":"W3037108812","doi":"10.1093/forsci/fxaa008","title":"Population and Stand-Level Inference in Forest Inventory with Penalized Splines","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Forest Science","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Overfitting; Estimator; Statistics; Econometrics; Population; Variance (accounting); Mathematics; Parametric statistics; Inference; Population variance; Parametric model; Range (aeronautics); Additive model; Nonparametric statistics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001977736,0.000084037,0.00008937475,0.00003947911,0.0001609548,0.00006245489,0.0001948717,0.00002178013,0.00002769414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001373036,0.00006582723,0.000009032007,0.0007214201,0.0005368413,0.0003332535,0.0001192043,0.00007590857,0.00003964192],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000608246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003479929,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001170791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00329408,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990096,0.00001355551,0.0001280255,0.0003339253,0.0003169483,0.0001979182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996092,0.00003070034,0.00005406842,0.000147035,0.00001084499,0.0001481948],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001840692,0.00001493097,0.965158,0.000005454366,5.241208e-7,0.000002410069,0.0006204252,0.02831784,0.001636741,0.002740861,0.00005323999,0.001431116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002278103,0.00005174919,0.8803831,0.00001971309,0.000002356872,0.000003017465,0.00005992777,0.1159433,0.0000714056,0.002646284,0.0004835952,0.0001077616],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.990056,0.00001158518,0.007697201,0.0007631025,0.00001518229,0.0001647336,0.000002098684,0.00002616343,0.001263969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959365,0.000006579407,0.003794128,0.0001696289,0.00001487102,0.000002852478,0.000003116018,0.000005263856,0.00006704399],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08762547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2684357,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03176679952313382,"score_gpt":0.2622343869677526,"score_spread":0.2304675874446188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}