{"id":"W3037507981","doi":"10.1037/cep0000209","title":"When “bad” is good: How evaluative judgments eliminate the standard anchoring effect.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Anchoring; Psychology; PsycINFO; Priming (agriculture); Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Experimental psychology; Cognition; MEDLINE","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008948314,0.0003856911,0.0003820349,0.001119602,0.0006166785,0.003238893,0.0005842928,0.0009097817,0.004280456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08715857,0.0004367278,0.0003045982,0.000886154,0.00321649,0.006441217,0.001826379,0.001539568,0.0006318956],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007061906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008778149,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001545064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002117846,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9947938,0.002265463,0.0003029388,0.0009829798,0.001444397,0.0002102703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9486668,0.03217083,0.009615048,0.005680967,0.002795402,0.001071],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00341446,0.0006119902,0.08630211,0.001184892,0.0004397075,0.0004811011,0.02544858,0.002642006,0.09170458,0.1860592,0.008909161,0.5928022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003033996,0.000955254,0.3525465,0.0005995237,0.0004139166,0.0008296728,0.008372066,0.01592822,0.04868542,0.5343451,0.03671873,0.0003020459],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8495839,0.001543882,0.06028296,0.003988882,0.0003530159,0.0001345759,0.0003316739,0.0004359333,0.0833451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853064,0.0002495844,0.0127982,0.00036629,0.00003328459,0.00003959913,0.00008640556,0.00009165986,0.001028622],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008948314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04732376,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1583104538575124,"score_gpt":0.4096731112367655,"score_spread":0.2513626573792531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}