{"id":"W3037727144","doi":"10.1111/bioe.12773","title":"Decision analysis approach to risk/benefit evaluation in the ethical review of controlled human infection studies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bioethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Infection and Immunity; McGill University; Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal","funders":"Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Bioethics; Risk assessment; Ethical issues; Informed consent; Psychology; Risk analysis (engineering); Medicine; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Political science; Alternative medicine; Pathology; Law; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05674473,0.0001307287,0.0009684033,0.0002175948,0.0001194074,0.00001586163,0.0002403017,0.0006965076,0.00004244078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.278066,0.00007847776,0.0003730189,0.002469315,0.0003979936,0.00002431743,0.0001452783,0.004666339,0.00001625262],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000108835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002766965,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002786253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001010047,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9934607,0.00177329,0.001083368,0.0004300734,0.003072493,0.0001801481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9652385,0.02963879,0.0003915626,0.0008313939,0.003708501,0.0001912095],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01135242,0.005051185,0.315064,0.07060787,0.0134198,0.00003273214,0.05714638,0.00755794,0.001451287,0.4304234,0.01023487,0.07765811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03955229,0.01027414,0.5614661,0.03632198,0.0373488,0.000009703889,0.007960165,0.07111792,0.000728021,0.2296817,0.004245047,0.001294089],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5295206,0.05075295,0.01372641,0.3845176,0.0002616011,0.01141011,0.00002942459,0.00009600606,0.009685283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9219291,0.05790874,0.002149267,0.01765534,0.0001263193,0.0001768035,0.00002332603,0.0000107044,0.00002042958],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3924085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976299,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7865979689484858,"score_gpt":0.6735909203461252,"score_spread":0.1130070486023605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}