{"id":"W3037727144","doi":"10.1111/bioe.12773","title":"Decision analysis approach to risk/benefit evaluation in the ethical review of controlled human infection studies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bioethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Infection and Immunity; McGill University; Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal","funders":"Wellcome Trust","keywords":"Bioethics; Risk assessment; Ethical issues; Informed consent; Psychology; Risk analysis (engineering); Medicine; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Political science; Alternative medicine; Pathology; Law; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6252474,0.004225735,0.009496019,0.01361598,0.004147642,0.01649804,0.007317509,0.01348947,0.007433324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6028228,0.002925174,0.005738547,0.01030722,0.01892562,0.01192346,0.01013873,0.01843284,0.000871095],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02363885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04796325,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004957112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005621985,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1780333,0.7794916,0.01580842,0.005429862,0.01911,0.002126792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1458429,0.814712,0.01273545,0.008639044,0.01569179,0.002378792],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001157192,0.0002535452,0.001274289,0.004708264,0.001963869,0.00048388,0.00327165,0.03826405,0.000317398,0.8561321,0.006454813,0.0857191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006065236,0.0003711437,0.0004028447,0.00300885,0.0004739485,0.0001505651,0.0006433649,0.05078077,0.000510746,0.9268478,0.01602091,0.0001825272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.002716059,0.006174596,0.9520828,0.01882719,0.001048698,0.005686471,0.0002114037,0.0001036917,0.01314902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1198013,0.003744784,0.8565671,0.004744596,0.001115976,0.01260389,0.000119162,0.0000980223,0.00120526],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3747526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4621367,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7865979689484858,"score_gpt":0.6735909203461252,"score_spread":0.1130070486023605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}