{"id":"W3038124556","doi":"10.1111/jerd.12615","title":"Effect of zirconia decontamination protocols on bond strength and surface wettability","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","topic":"Dental materials and restorations","field":"Dentistry","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo","keywords":"Human decontamination; Wetting; Cubic zirconia; Contamination; Bond strength; Saliva; Cementation (geology); Contact angle; Materials science; Dentistry; Nuclear chemistry; Chemistry; Waste management; Ceramic; Composite material; Adhesive; Cement; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000480414,0.0001569242,0.000413124,0.00003959515,0.00008953545,0.00009047868,0.0001070116,0.0001017029,0.0000399883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002371625,0.0001114753,0.00007955408,0.0000899981,0.0001737098,0.0002059395,0.00004165175,0.0002054764,0.000008687286],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003095148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004398075,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007181118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008880422,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986079,0.0002994153,0.0005288252,0.0001673791,0.0002903702,0.0001060578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987919,0.0001884399,0.0006097876,0.0001098409,0.000147521,0.0001525198],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.009900866,0.001782509,0.3201275,0.00409661,0.0006275365,0.0025411,0.003976508,0.0002267456,0.6169742,0.005299918,0.00810494,0.02634155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01097917,0.01825204,0.4445288,0.001362315,0.0003485121,0.002813607,0.001337105,0.0003212114,0.5122866,0.0005027989,0.00657937,0.0006884494],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978548,0.0002182821,0.0001265252,0.0001941199,0.000260668,0.001148664,0.00003487472,0.000006792559,0.0001552331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995497,0.00002330866,0.0002034309,0.00002486607,0.00007955091,0.00002428908,0.000003133101,0.00001133985,0.00008037844],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1244013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4545829,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0178667654952973,"score_gpt":0.3221988442724284,"score_spread":0.3043320787771311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}