{"id":"W3038965772","doi":"10.1080/15459624.2020.1777296","title":"The application of novel field measurement and field evaluation protocols for assessing health care workers’ exposure risk to antineoplastic drugs","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene","topic":"Safe Handling of Antineoplastic Drugs","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"WorkSafeBC","keywords":"Antineoplastic Drugs; Environmental health; Occupational exposure; Exposure assessment; Occupational hygiene; Medicine; Field (mathematics); Health risk; Health care; Occupational safety and health; Risk analysis (engineering); Pharmacology; Pathology; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03216885,0.001399808,0.0007645776,0.001508029,0.001794399,0.001704909,0.003272687,0.002147802,0.001873672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02400029,0.001090493,0.000747402,0.001061328,0.001801052,0.001159736,0.002157074,0.001479345,0.0009263001],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002046557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004632028,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006659335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01316339,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9621603,0.01762314,0.003737553,0.004156421,0.01150027,0.0008223017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9742892,0.005507102,0.004574687,0.005003366,0.01018902,0.0004365738],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001990612,0.00412706,0.05241999,0.002158805,0.0002071559,0.0003610571,0.003630747,0.00604074,0.7180114,0.002865676,0.004542083,0.2036446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007205378,0.02506653,0.1196394,0.001106469,0.0004911968,0.001552302,0.003809562,0.04136898,0.7547684,0.003279097,0.04770271,0.0004948421],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1968923,0.0008910821,0.7542022,0.0006854607,0.0002926156,0.03752575,0.001306066,0.001122585,0.007081885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1653126,0.0008470456,0.8055699,0.0005113942,0.00007916727,0.0238717,0.000729322,0.00006998043,0.003008891],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03216885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1701272,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08922690562193021,"score_gpt":0.4176115429228404,"score_spread":0.3283846373009102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}