{"id":"W3039897021","doi":"10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106698","title":"In vitro and in vivo evaluation of silk fibroin-hardystonite-gentamicin nanofibrous scaffold for tissue engineering applications","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Polymer Testing","topic":"Bone Tissue Engineering Materials","field":"Engineering","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Canada Foundation for Innovation","keywords":"Fibroin; Scaffold; In vivo; Materials science; Biomedical engineering; Tissue engineering; Biocompatibility; Gentamicin; Angiogenesis; Drug delivery; Nanofiber; SILK; Chemistry; Nanotechnology; Antibiotics; Biology; Biochemistry; Medicine; Biotechnology; Composite material","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002990203,0.0001668216,0.0002700043,0.0001566526,0.00001519239,0.00001830876,0.00008997746,0.00006192056,0.00001442665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001670058,0.0002124395,0.00001728786,0.0004285323,0.00001107597,0.0001285135,0.00002957253,0.00006466672,0.000002928396],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007076591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001680317,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005297927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002484728,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989948,0.00001904176,0.0003891368,0.0002002921,0.0001493504,0.0002473905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999513,0.0002198879,0.00004597236,0.000123685,0.00003404293,0.00006339201],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006299183,0.000006278719,0.0001426188,0.0003881842,0.000006750474,8.198923e-7,0.0002212309,0.1202357,0.8760042,0.00002188916,0.000009922321,0.002956132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003743442,0.00001343993,0.0003086935,0.00006283349,0.00001627632,0.000003680373,0.00001300214,0.3412812,0.6577004,0.00001112997,0.00008510026,0.0001299471],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9842399,0.003115272,0.01104008,0.00007250818,0.000123307,0.0009844298,0.00006111762,0.0002508404,0.0001125749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865353,0.00000284751,0.01300988,0.00001183635,0.000106002,0.0002572592,0.00000908095,0.00006128884,0.000006547224],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2210455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8663032,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02708803952297169,"score_gpt":0.251163176129113,"score_spread":0.2240751366061413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}