{"id":"W3039897021","doi":"10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106698","title":"In vitro and in vivo evaluation of silk fibroin-hardystonite-gentamicin nanofibrous scaffold for tissue engineering applications","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Polymer Testing","topic":"Bone Tissue Engineering Materials","field":"Engineering","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Canada Foundation for Innovation","keywords":"Fibroin; Scaffold; In vivo; Materials science; Biomedical engineering; Tissue engineering; Biocompatibility; Gentamicin; Angiogenesis; Drug delivery; Nanofiber; SILK; Chemistry; Nanotechnology; Antibiotics; Biology; Biochemistry; Medicine; Biotechnology; Composite material","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004975714,0.0004947537,0.0001709841,0.0003357905,0.0002086408,0.0001816312,0.0001539696,0.0004213015,0.0009096269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002896608,0.0001592447,0.000261145,0.0001914043,0.0003371561,0.0003239636,0.0001650267,0.0002023174,0.0001397509],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001635579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001897013,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001163526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002345058,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997705,0.00004150789,0.00002907156,0.00003947199,0.00007028911,0.00004911877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994525,0.0002142452,0.0001398345,0.00003469737,0.00009677272,0.00006186766],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004858943,0.00002685841,0.00008261383,0.00002356523,0.000001721395,0.00003459493,0.00002730441,0.00006572482,0.9993666,0.00001368815,0.000003090036,0.0003056609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003089202,0.0003826966,0.001358201,0.000002565373,0.00001168903,0.00004995929,0.00002854247,0.0003924831,0.9975897,0.00001007584,0.0001674264,0.000003538364],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957364,0.0004277626,0.002925268,0.00001909798,0.00001300243,0.00002338811,0.00006371945,0.00003070957,0.000760646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946726,0.0003245593,0.003130322,0.00002043901,0.00000780919,0.00003972003,0.0000976667,0.00001583801,0.001691057],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001163526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003042996,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02708803952297169,"score_gpt":0.251163176129113,"score_spread":0.2240751366061413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}