{"id":"W3040226101","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2007.01387","title":"An Algebraic Approach for the Stability Analysis of BLDC Motor Controllers","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Control and Stability of Dynamical Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Control theory (sociology); DC motor; Stability (learning theory); Controller (irrigation); PID controller; Algebraic number; Computer science; Constant (computer programming); Electronic speed control; Loop (graph theory); Closed loop; Control engineering; Mathematics; Control (management); Engineering; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004403054,0.0005926108,0.0003736839,0.0007688177,0.0004890651,0.0007565269,0.0006613933,0.0003890262,0.003324262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001797831,0.0002037469,0.0005000376,0.0003914706,0.0005923796,0.001009341,0.0005136565,0.001392752,0.0007562811],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005126154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004342149,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007475519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007342743,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996805,0.00005702116,0.00002267003,0.00005036118,0.0001744308,0.00001497363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994438,0.000236755,0.00006895216,0.00004190448,0.0001941991,0.00001431628],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006248811,0.0000887209,0.0004133668,0.000373712,0.00004830927,0.0002123454,0.0003150352,0.3433254,0.0656853,0.4769212,0.001674131,0.1108799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001343635,0.00009442514,0.0001869233,0.00002653604,0.00001471755,0.00008461188,0.00002921619,0.9122199,0.00722896,0.06999018,0.01008873,0.00002240147],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002700605,0.0001308547,0.9944656,0.00003927855,0.00002977402,0.00001914375,0.00001817302,0.00006309108,0.002533516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4449075,0.001753154,0.5427915,0.0001553488,0.0003404081,0.0003077499,0.0001506978,0.0001679346,0.009425657],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003324262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0111208,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06009746259256683,"score_gpt":0.1730197710993356,"score_spread":0.1129223085067688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}