{"id":"W3040739583","doi":"10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101754","title":"Relationships between earthquake insurance take-up rates and seismic risk indicators for Canadian households","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction","topic":"Flood Risk Assessment and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Census; Seismic hazard; Urban seismic risk; Geography; Seismic risk; Natural hazard; Earthquake scenario; Actuarial science; Business; Seismology; Environmental health; Population; Geology; Meteorology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005419264,0.0003238141,0.0002808802,0.001743621,0.001977477,0.001374001,0.001661398,0.0005030883,0.007472948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003883285,0.0003810608,0.0008609892,0.004801955,0.0005094444,0.0005285129,0.0007721636,0.0009811934,0.0004018567],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02323591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02215527,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9979019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9987546,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994788,0.00003202242,0.00003697066,0.00006551453,0.0001509296,0.0002358814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961023,0.0003647084,0.000767409,0.00009547207,0.001796733,0.0008733053],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009063489,0.00003199506,0.9930612,0.00002123264,0.00005615639,0.00005252248,0.0007595207,0.0004488039,0.00008018473,0.0002541664,0.001665023,0.003478492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004055405,0.00001081093,0.9962884,0.0000173107,0.00002724082,0.00002502857,0.002034634,0.000617658,0.00003767535,0.00003754211,0.0008852627,0.00001437765],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886795,0.0003625569,0.00009527087,0.0004161459,0.000009636886,0.00002337063,0.006645225,0.00001829804,0.003749947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952227,0.0003395246,0.0001245297,0.00004501234,0.000004012495,0.00001004346,0.002234292,0.000005485204,0.002014391],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02323591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1685891,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02279894339007632,"score_gpt":0.2547506602799315,"score_spread":0.2319517168898552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}