{"id":"W3040806765","doi":"10.1080/00949655.2022.2082428","title":"A comprehensive empirical power comparison of univariate goodness-of-fit tests for the Laplace distribution","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation","topic":"Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Univariate; Goodness of fit; Statistic; Statistics; Mathematics; Econometrics; Monte Carlo method; Range (aeronautics); Sample size determination; Laplace transform; Multivariate statistics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004772113,0.0002108341,0.0007109279,0.0001033785,0.0002076729,0.0000490766,0.0001858722,0.0001458651,0.0001338752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002578,0.0001690493,0.0001560182,0.0002266505,0.0002238282,0.00006550631,0.0001430621,0.0004823049,6.153901e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001176182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001896121,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006422951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001057438,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971319,0.0002706125,0.001635055,0.0002077137,0.0006096697,0.0001450067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814041,0.0147926,0.001988679,0.0001722296,0.001536376,0.0001060453],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004324477,0.000627086,0.0006927956,0.0006529586,0.0001871585,0.000001274392,0.0007762088,0.5903621,0.00003380382,0.3979218,0.003393194,0.004919144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009057762,0.000291276,0.03204318,0.00008132713,0.0003186659,0.000004301042,0.0004529716,0.773569,0.00001454037,0.1912059,0.0009779272,0.0001351025],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03426921,0.0001393643,0.9605018,0.0005623563,0.0002383337,0.0006957019,0.003551191,0.00001534669,0.00002664379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9449977,0.00001402464,0.0541679,0.00003316839,0.00003948425,0.00002057916,0.000701329,0.00001697573,0.00000880871],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9107285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6893632,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2651345957697435,"score_gpt":0.5146856578318333,"score_spread":0.2495510620620898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}