{"id":"W3042109403","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2020.06.007","title":"Preventing fall-from-height injuries in construction: Effectiveness of a regulatory training standard","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Safety Research","topic":"Occupational Health and Safety Research","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Work & Health","funders":"","keywords":"Incidence (geometry); Injury prevention; Occupational safety and health; Poison control; Training (meteorology); Medicine; Suicide prevention; Census; Human factors and ergonomics; Demography; Fall prevention; Work (physics); Physical therapy; Medical emergency; Engineering; Environmental health; Geography; Population; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01772485,0.0001304526,0.0007281711,0.0004760318,0.0005373079,0.00001102417,0.0004035391,0.0002235973,0.0004143553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004711284,0.0001113424,0.0001357352,0.001168452,0.0003631806,0.000332295,0.0002203073,0.002912713,0.00002292979],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005217878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004731741,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001477795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004869888,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9896882,0.005701762,0.001675133,0.0002405692,0.001958231,0.000736103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881329,0.008647561,0.0005395093,0.0001997427,0.002012564,0.0004677065],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.04335898,0.0001817545,0.8612386,0.004020205,0.0001762211,0.00009008304,0.015736,0.0001695612,0.004429159,0.008731225,0.0006906675,0.06117755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005156983,0.001787507,0.962987,0.004175179,0.00001251086,0.000009433577,0.01211324,0.0001812484,0.001005387,0.005954179,0.006460413,0.0001569076],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885559,0.0009111122,0.0004582808,0.004002326,0.0003465281,0.000986555,0.00009702904,0.0000107106,0.004631522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968326,0.0003951212,0.001965915,0.00006161766,0.0006490902,0.00002526528,0.000007868858,0.00002320015,0.0000393306],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1017484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993876,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1780822631628634,"score_gpt":0.5098267174208334,"score_spread":0.33174445425797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}