{"id":"W3043166389","doi":"10.26434/chemrxiv.11522133.v1","title":"A Simple Method for Incorporating Polarization Effects in Solvation Free Energy Calculations Using Fixed-Charge Force Fields","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"ChemRxiv","topic":"Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Ontario Tech University; University of Guelph","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Polarizability; Solvation; Partial charge; Statistical physics; Force field (fiction); Polarization (electrochemistry); Chemistry; Molecule; Molecular physics; Physics; Quantum mechanics; Physical chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006688416,0.0008178728,0.0005641551,0.000685218,0.0006647608,0.0005280089,0.00184697,0.00122188,0.005805669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001765563,0.0003869023,0.0007230703,0.0005685108,0.0003218266,0.0009128703,0.0007631748,0.001436737,0.001357739],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003147253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009098185,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001063346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002011826,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997243,0.00006624771,0.00001366697,0.00002632113,0.0001493867,0.00002004852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994577,0.0001913628,0.00003748512,0.0001218074,0.0001583971,0.00003328313],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002021707,0.0005264805,0.00251737,0.0009121834,0.0004003746,0.0006965192,0.0004110556,0.4317548,0.1084308,0.1152214,0.01496083,0.323966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001476262,0.0001356788,0.0009942417,0.00005246898,0.00004220816,0.0002298348,0.00002875965,0.925667,0.03283305,0.021416,0.01837406,0.0000790538],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.02987497,0.0001459592,0.9623308,0.000224251,0.0001589706,0.0002365585,0.0005795466,0.002313184,0.004135711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2077005,0.0003499984,0.7825863,0.0002434906,0.00005648778,0.001005339,0.0006659059,0.001656209,0.00573571],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005805669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01942188,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02786383753366791,"score_gpt":0.3134393544548853,"score_spread":0.2855755169212174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}