{"id":"W3043525779","doi":"10.1177/0967391120939663","title":"A failure criterion revision method for composite materials","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Polymers and Polymer Composites","topic":"Mechanical Behavior of Composites","field":"Engineering","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Delamination (geology); Function (biology); Composite number; Failure mechanism; Exponent; Composite laminates; Mathematics; Applied mathematics; Structural engineering; Materials science; Algorithm; Composite material; Engineering; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001022776,0.0003485776,0.0005158487,0.00008097891,0.0001472856,0.0001814509,0.0002300085,0.0001325709,0.0003307516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009997949,0.00033433,0.0001203523,0.0001561074,0.00003921687,0.0001506677,0.00009261158,0.0001325649,0.00002192334],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001482703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000634803,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002589009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001409472,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985802,0.00007054739,0.0004152022,0.0003737574,0.000170984,0.0003893299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991413,0.0002174716,0.00005963583,0.000209018,0.00002864933,0.0003439021],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008686148,0.00001423371,0.00011178,0.0002081269,0.0000495017,0.000003427986,0.0002387171,0.00001453416,0.9833357,0.001087652,0.0008369085,0.0140125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006007869,0.0001953691,0.0001314155,0.00008173181,0.0001254781,0.00002123505,0.00002277083,0.00782501,0.9813406,0.00004357058,0.009183317,0.0004287026],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7899272,0.03133205,0.1633757,0.009420319,0.0009418627,0.001592773,0.0006127324,0.001711566,0.001085858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9623926,0.0001069817,0.03553763,0.001345209,0.0003016234,0.00004223669,0.0001162901,0.00009868401,0.00005873753],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1724654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999109,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0171367308555446,"score_gpt":0.2628819078194664,"score_spread":0.2457451769639218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}