{"id":"W3046377619","doi":"10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0001064","title":"Design, Construction, and Performance of Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavement Reinforced with GFRP Bars: Case Study","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Composites for Construction","topic":"Concrete Corrosion and Durability","field":"Engineering","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Transportation of Ontario; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Fibre-reinforced plastic; Materials science; Corrosion; Strain gauge; Service life; Reinforced concrete; Structural engineering; Glass fiber; Steel bar; Composite material; Bar (unit); Fiber-reinforced concrete; Geotechnical engineering; Geology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007089329,0.001000058,0.0004469249,0.0006144725,0.000746312,0.0006963704,0.001512989,0.00173756,0.0008524115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009775683,0.0004359589,0.0006595627,0.0004505352,0.0006984536,0.0004692846,0.0003732608,0.0003569417,0.0003406632],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001968957,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04800554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06861594,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991173,0.0002127889,0.00003063072,0.000178464,0.0002770018,0.0001837241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992315,0.0002125097,0.0001037569,0.00009719653,0.0002110981,0.0001439674],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001274911,0.003290108,0.101618,0.0004178383,0.0001567194,0.0132946,0.001018733,0.6129884,0.2055275,0.001351334,0.0009248493,0.05813699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000255222,0.01403849,0.1551738,0.00004881814,0.0002541021,0.003109689,0.002704073,0.6824766,0.1356228,0.0005284409,0.005559708,0.0002281013],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948002,0.00004418176,0.003987862,0.00001447305,0.000002864678,0.0001131384,0.00008151317,0.00005548451,0.0009002444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856479,0.0000691839,0.01226467,0.000005092088,0.000002504412,0.00007325019,0.0001356242,0.00001989346,0.001781904],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04800554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09545225,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01377280032985355,"score_gpt":0.2089597104307295,"score_spread":0.1951869101008759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}