{"id":"W3047044748","doi":"10.1057/s41260-020-00179-w","title":"A robust framework for risk parity portfolios","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Asset Management","topic":"Risk and Portfolio Optimization","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Mitacs","keywords":"Portfolio optimization; Portfolio; Robustness (evolution); Asset allocation; Econometrics; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Covariance matrix; Coherent risk measure; Risk measure; Spectral risk measure; Expected shortfall; Parity (physics); Mathematics; Economics; Algorithm; Financial economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005831098,0.001379862,0.00168579,0.001312965,0.0005230446,0.003062891,0.002673642,0.002486247,0.006571786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01681446,0.000918253,0.001376404,0.001254859,0.001759292,0.003779399,0.002592832,0.002869768,0.001082325],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001330105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00173224,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002414996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001671008,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976913,0.001137229,0.00009438385,0.0003178788,0.0005692077,0.0001900112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951192,0.002742158,0.0004898343,0.0006481885,0.0007701922,0.0002304191],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004147635,0.00003184551,0.0001841595,0.00006678751,0.00006812232,0.0001042224,0.00003653872,0.2487219,0.001166774,0.728448,0.002143864,0.01898626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001533335,0.00002917394,0.00007298464,0.00001599034,0.00001726778,0.00002983381,0.000006128811,0.7388272,0.000220853,0.2591471,0.001603319,0.00001475455],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002295109,0.0002804768,0.9939365,0.0003700458,0.00004523132,0.00001711066,0.00006669843,0.00008075344,0.002908186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4978697,0.001910488,0.4791233,0.0005440378,0.0008202291,0.0003028781,0.0005884551,0.0004105854,0.01843032],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006571786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03083813,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1576895588262129,"score_gpt":0.378382298171382,"score_spread":0.220692739345169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}