{"id":"W3047044748","doi":"10.1057/s41260-020-00179-w","title":"A robust framework for risk parity portfolios","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Asset Management","topic":"Risk and Portfolio Optimization","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Mitacs","keywords":"Portfolio optimization; Portfolio; Robustness (evolution); Asset allocation; Econometrics; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Covariance matrix; Coherent risk measure; Risk measure; Spectral risk measure; Expected shortfall; Parity (physics); Mathematics; Economics; Algorithm; Financial economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002772358,0.0001193399,0.0003334185,0.0002287049,0.0001189561,0.000277209,0.0006597388,0.00006836415,0.0002330705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001920489,0.00008479271,0.0002793341,0.0006788264,0.00002205034,0.000366898,0.000103983,0.0002307257,0.00005698291],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002653633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003429208,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002227814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001266625,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972865,0.0001150058,0.001010746,0.0002285151,0.001167167,0.0001920931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972339,0.0004309989,0.001426287,0.0002696709,0.0004233505,0.0002157847],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004616351,0.0001955139,0.04927853,0.00002153747,0.0003347133,0.0001478187,0.00061164,0.1641922,0.000003176384,0.0272155,0.590835,0.1667027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001372207,0.0006629842,0.04697572,0.00004838428,0.0003233389,0.00002119377,0.001576825,0.03951243,0.00004864344,0.183193,0.7259814,0.0002838813],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01199998,0.0001449218,0.9778275,0.005775485,0.0005991103,0.0002830475,0.00001742068,0.0000134949,0.003338987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5879814,0.002476552,0.4063486,0.001818293,0.0008100361,0.000008128298,0.000003824336,0.00002032724,0.0005328035],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5759814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3457747,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1576895588262129,"score_gpt":0.378382298171382,"score_spread":0.220692739345169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}