{"id":"W3047228118","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125371","title":"High-frequency analysis of dissolved organic carbon storm responses in headwater streams of contrasting forest harvest history","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hydrology","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Foundation for Innovation","keywords":"Dissolved organic carbon; Environmental science; Hydrology (agriculture); STREAMS; Peat; Acid neutralizing capacity; Experimental forest; Storm; Drainage basin; Climate change; Ecosystem; Baseflow; Ecology; Streamflow; Geology; Soil science; Acid deposition; Soil water; Oceanography; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001263021,0.00008781614,0.0001859874,0.0005623571,0.0003302629,0.0003025958,0.000115127,0.0002076198,0.0007475747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002989772,0.00009598866,0.0001360279,0.0004617665,0.0001335884,0.0002025776,0.0002391883,0.0001687971,0.00008345647],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003045834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001895252,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006787868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01722796,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999225,0.00001167436,0.000004507826,0.00002696711,0.00001543995,0.00001878671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997855,0.00007365222,0.00004560214,0.000009312071,0.00004208898,0.0000438531],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001329551,0.000276664,0.8598652,0.00002579964,0.00009761721,0.0001039733,0.0003668911,0.0004553882,0.1265985,0.00007434221,0.0001604706,0.01064552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006318152,0.00005105567,0.9977864,8.275591e-7,0.00001225829,0.00003840482,0.0001647103,0.0007112247,0.001138451,0.00002098448,0.0000666738,0.000002643148],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997583,0.000008101589,0.00006793477,0.000003891083,0.00000104815,0.000001953342,0.00006902131,0.000001516929,0.00008814634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999476,0.00001142362,0.0001351388,0.000009080751,0.000003750396,0.000004704099,0.0001903759,0.00000149389,0.000168162],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006787868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0134967,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01452140509498023,"score_gpt":0.2125922620074207,"score_spread":0.1980708569124405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}