{"id":"W3047228118","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125371","title":"High-frequency analysis of dissolved organic carbon storm responses in headwater streams of contrasting forest harvest history","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hydrology","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Foundation for Innovation","keywords":"Dissolved organic carbon; Environmental science; Hydrology (agriculture); STREAMS; Peat; Acid neutralizing capacity; Experimental forest; Storm; Drainage basin; Climate change; Ecosystem; Baseflow; Ecology; Streamflow; Geology; Soil science; Acid deposition; Soil water; Oceanography; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005114703,0.0001247431,0.0006757058,0.0002490019,0.00002319538,0.000001550998,0.0002502202,0.00008220566,0.0003520393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002125131,0.0001008362,0.0001276839,0.0003278467,0.0003655537,0.0001209821,0.0001230076,0.0002043972,0.000003476306],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001661972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001858899,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008347305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00305206,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985067,0.0002026473,0.0007132007,0.0001699,0.0001840071,0.0002235916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990243,0.0001598318,0.0006033136,0.000126068,0.00001874442,0.00006771904],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004718594,0.0001011826,0.9300128,0.00001378528,0.0005525414,0.0001001358,0.001586242,0.01171675,0.05525856,0.00003306126,0.00009223973,0.00006082279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001164891,0.001008425,0.9907949,0.00001295019,0.0008462188,0.000007708597,0.0001346365,0.003212697,0.00226736,0.0002624754,0.0001610355,0.0001267039],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974915,0.0002035767,0.00008179904,0.001778163,0.0001137016,0.00006526458,0.000002955678,0.000006363848,0.0002566222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994397,0.00004981085,0.0001615483,0.0002784001,0.00002594298,0.000001407799,0.000001827029,0.000009611957,0.00003181474],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06078207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.411198,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01452140509498023,"score_gpt":0.2125922620074207,"score_spread":0.1980708569124405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}