{"id":"W3047416338","doi":"","title":"Welfare Ambiguity and Economic Voting in Canada: Explaining Variations to the Sociotropic and Pocketbook Hypotheses","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Voting; Welfare; Economics; Voting behavior; Positive economics; Econometrics; Political science; Computer science; Law; Market economy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001968953,0.0002736836,0.0006632756,0.002170095,0.005866356,0.002389808,0.001190974,0.0006036889,0.007253597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01139276,0.0001869946,0.0004965817,0.003916855,0.002986771,0.0005785939,0.001928058,0.001290406,0.0002500642],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02290262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02898659,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9874363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9945386,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981735,0.0001948204,0.00005048212,0.0001672541,0.0004612228,0.0009528297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932941,0.001782034,0.00133332,0.0003893484,0.001728964,0.001472189],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003016723,0.00007825266,0.9525471,0.00004269445,0.0000562665,0.0002605267,0.009424642,0.001592283,0.0004663376,0.0128587,0.001809048,0.02056251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001724514,0.00001608494,0.985016,0.00004570189,0.00001838809,0.00003104611,0.008450788,0.001708304,0.0001224882,0.001846405,0.002709281,0.00001820731],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909389,0.0002525388,0.0002097295,0.001127974,0.00000796931,0.00001930596,0.0002944253,0.000006077597,0.007143129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988445,0.00006851051,0.00007444431,0.00003881661,0.000002521627,0.000003578503,0.0001066279,0.000003158024,0.0008577596],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02290262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.166171,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01766754049151715,"score_gpt":0.2799024717200657,"score_spread":0.2622349312285486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}