{"id":"W3049376848","doi":"10.1139/cjp-2020-0286","title":"Pocket formula for incoherent scattering cross section","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Physics","topic":"Radiation Shielding Materials Analysis","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Physics; Incoherent scatter; Cross section (physics); Scattering; Range (aeronautics); Atomic number; Atomic physics; Scattering length; Nuclear cross section; Energy (signal processing); Scattering cross-section; Nuclear physics; Simple (philosophy); Computational physics; Elastic scattering; Optics; Quantum mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002450613,0.00008579274,0.0001997577,0.00005122326,0.0001536325,0.0002718694,0.0002062665,0.00003980977,0.0003520254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001139891,0.00008267511,0.0001175489,0.0001346882,0.00003715435,0.0003556784,0.000008524707,0.00006556291,0.00002314062],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001255255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003525262,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005650906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005601387,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992076,0.00002763957,0.0003268875,0.0001071186,0.0001251589,0.0002056076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989738,0.00003148177,0.0003017461,0.00008497925,0.0002135401,0.0003944622],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004485578,0.000009674352,0.002474007,0.00008812438,0.00004561358,0.00001278467,0.001619885,0.01817847,0.9674851,0.0006915981,0.006521925,0.002828019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001006784,0.0003093383,0.002962398,0.00006334334,0.0001112733,0.00002635293,0.0001964009,0.002480483,0.9639754,0.002918184,0.02559811,0.0003519282],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9745524,0.00004105224,0.0234053,0.000876892,0.0009133922,0.00007879862,0.00006033041,0.000008395489,0.00006344506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962512,0.000001523036,0.001209503,0.0006970955,0.001800595,0.000003053704,0.000003694166,0.00001591027,0.00001739959],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02219579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3854432,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03334320829242843,"score_gpt":0.2688905339619637,"score_spread":0.2355473256695352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}