{"id":"W3049376848","doi":"10.1139/cjp-2020-0286","title":"Pocket formula for incoherent scattering cross section","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Physics","topic":"Radiation Shielding Materials Analysis","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Physics; Incoherent scatter; Cross section (physics); Scattering; Range (aeronautics); Atomic number; Atomic physics; Scattering length; Nuclear cross section; Energy (signal processing); Scattering cross-section; Nuclear physics; Simple (philosophy); Computational physics; Elastic scattering; Optics; Quantum mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001140392,0.0009522475,0.0006070779,0.002425706,0.0005755438,0.000756307,0.002242003,0.0008788615,0.008231429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003317202,0.0003522219,0.0006861348,0.0010928,0.0006044777,0.001974746,0.0008446963,0.00128193,0.003476279],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008894518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000770367,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001783302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001983953,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985512,0.0001796689,0.00007951399,0.0002838445,0.0007832363,0.0001224535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990261,0.000276636,0.00006767319,0.0001395802,0.0004669718,0.00002309352],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000711108,0.0001601972,0.004724513,0.0009335446,0.0001307505,0.0007868531,0.0004799487,0.05594589,0.1042876,0.6156541,0.02210772,0.1947178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003310882,0.0001423274,0.005588675,0.0002871039,0.0001391723,0.003385411,0.0001368527,0.4992156,0.0954763,0.2256758,0.1696931,0.0002266129],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01329154,0.002900327,0.9550724,0.0003065467,0.0004932114,0.0001282392,0.0005667286,0.0009823818,0.02625864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2991602,0.005859009,0.6435888,0.001110645,0.0004086049,0.0005929887,0.001857852,0.002348096,0.04507375],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008231429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02753687,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03334320829242843,"score_gpt":0.2688905339619637,"score_spread":0.2355473256695352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}