{"id":"W3080170233","doi":"10.1002/edn3.129","title":"Fine‐scale environmental heterogeneity shapes fluvial fish communities as revealed by eDNA metabarcoding","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Biodiversity; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Spatial ecology; Relative species abundance; Fluvial; Environmental science; Geography; Fishery; Biology; Structural basin","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002245827,0.0007749232,0.0006221291,0.00004018293,0.001073183,0.00008619647,0.001079242,0.00021157,0.01748477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001727618,0.0008386293,0.0003599226,0.0001405416,0.00168533,0.0007451137,0.002650342,0.0005606205,0.009777876],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002849609,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001885786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009998649,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960235,0.0002997821,0.0006042355,0.0009994269,0.001138823,0.0009342335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984843,0.0001153693,0.0002454839,0.0005340595,6.83726e-7,0.0006201143],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000933838,0.0004429523,0.6695483,0.00001282131,0.0001153606,0.00002935401,0.002645411,0.0001030832,0.2953915,0.000001549826,0.02991476,0.001701485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002374903,0.0007978605,0.7177255,0.00002380925,0.0002531263,0.0000501853,0.006850299,0.0004103912,0.1712444,0.00004844399,0.0983188,0.001902253],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919431,0.0002821205,0.00003489993,0.001382737,0.0001334724,0.0006587093,0.001401704,0.0001700435,0.00399326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921706,0.0005333733,0.00111333,0.004495811,0.0001214224,0.0000588303,0.0005011716,0.00008515713,0.0009203447],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1241471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994065,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01600982594125543,"score_gpt":0.1985720402459806,"score_spread":0.1825622143047252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}