{"id":"W3080980893","doi":"10.1177/1049732320949167","title":"Unsettling Knowledge Synthesis Methods Using Institutional Ethnography: Reflections on the Scoping Review as a Critical Knowledge Synthesis Tool","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Qualitative Health Research","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Medical Library Association","keywords":"Reflexivity; Ethnography; Sociology; Positivism; Knowledge management; Process (computing); Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Social science; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6873831,0.002567588,0.003723383,0.01450449,0.01852825,0.04762294,0.009969681,0.01721179,0.003264412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6289515,0.003590792,0.003869654,0.01109434,0.1203675,0.04929367,0.03715161,0.02839687,0.001369172],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03181022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07479125,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007543121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01107243,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1612295,0.7859418,0.01933062,0.00731919,0.02237802,0.003800995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.09274435,0.8591543,0.008487452,0.01816486,0.02014346,0.001305639],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008216025,0.00006670776,0.0006675108,0.007514354,0.000141333,0.0007065847,0.6531711,0.0008465265,0.000714269,0.2573946,0.00922824,0.06946664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001209352,0.0001984522,0.0005062113,0.0518431,0.0001575807,0.0008671127,0.3735295,0.002307089,0.001984241,0.3070546,0.2611797,0.0002515856],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.02413397,0.08016095,0.4493015,0.3941201,0.009942332,0.005969394,0.000215303,0.0005602047,0.03559623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3441109,0.05386319,0.4990048,0.07015851,0.00322568,0.02135495,0.0001835348,0.001345405,0.006753083],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3126169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3855124,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9542093301975284,"score_gpt":0.8341471194460173,"score_spread":0.1200622107515111,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}