{"id":"W3081780517","doi":"10.22215/etd/2019-13652","title":"An evaluation of seed number as a measure of fitness: a review and experimental study","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Herbaceous plant; Measure (data warehouse); Seedling; Biology; Statistics; Mathematics; Ecology; Botany; Computer science; Data mining","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001702061,0.001005313,0.002310935,0.004675117,0.0003070635,0.001187008,0.001269466,0.001098575,0.002897994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00293939,0.0004743528,0.0008429624,0.00523748,0.0009322625,0.001744204,0.0006319504,0.001188385,0.001125203],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008956361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001604639,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002139698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002673994,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995453,0.00008388885,0.00009915018,0.0001263365,0.0001277007,0.00001759629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975529,0.001785967,0.0002213549,0.00005679788,0.0003224817,0.00006049632],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001146381,0.00009180329,0.0005490434,0.08267266,0.0002738553,0.0001062062,0.00009624234,0.0004873551,0.001719342,0.004254656,0.009566912,0.9000673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003519039,0.0003772188,0.007750549,0.04068168,0.001382812,0.001776852,0.0002364858,0.0003161703,0.001904443,0.004868581,0.9405556,0.0001145977],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001245753,0.9992502,0.0001164129,0.00008105543,0.0000477737,0.000003986539,0.0000201199,0.000003298914,0.000352541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009649128,0.998525,0.0002217998,0.00008471824,0.00004780691,0.000008028334,0.00002617073,0.000001901817,0.0001196857],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004675117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009694815,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2737186361200741,"score_gpt":0.395267684116594,"score_spread":0.1215490479965198,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}