{"id":"W3081913040","doi":"10.1007/s13178-020-00500-7","title":"Simpson’s Paradox in LGBTQ+ Policy: a Case Study","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sexuality Research and Social Policy","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Transgender; Poverty; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Aggregate data; Survey data collection; Confounding; Sociology; Political science; Demographic economics; Gender studies; Economics; Geography; Law; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01521801,0.0003428632,0.0007270108,0.001840301,0.02083137,0.008988431,0.00182305,0.009423965,0.009131719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03145023,0.0003710894,0.0004835833,0.003399429,0.01627722,0.006275231,0.009456073,0.009939657,0.0005841458],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01237711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01503992,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05745856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07959658,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9903436,0.006336738,0.0002612245,0.0004909948,0.001055818,0.001511639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9674041,0.02666702,0.001251625,0.000987298,0.001086877,0.00260301],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001451541,0.0006953842,0.01097911,0.000247464,0.00002410805,0.01068561,0.1632672,0.0007427642,0.0002681034,0.7604601,0.02028306,0.03220175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002646239,0.0001527775,0.007419978,0.00106403,0.0000631697,0.006893725,0.5237682,0.002600974,0.0007169314,0.2545984,0.2023719,0.00008542069],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6064627,0.001854801,0.002568365,0.1191238,0.0005133664,0.000162988,0.0001208627,0.00002997847,0.2691632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9778394,0.0007908383,0.001030125,0.008877159,0.00008763722,0.0000638847,0.00002637457,0.00003078818,0.0112539],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05745856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1142482,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.336648416659837,"score_gpt":0.5823920523546775,"score_spread":0.2457436356948405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}