{"id":"W3081913040","doi":"10.1007/s13178-020-00500-7","title":"Simpson’s Paradox in LGBTQ+ Policy: a Case Study","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sexuality Research and Social Policy","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Transgender; Poverty; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Aggregate data; Survey data collection; Confounding; Sociology; Political science; Demographic economics; Gender studies; Economics; Geography; Law; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002232879,0.0002392938,0.0004846524,0.0006587483,0.000921257,0.0001971508,0.0003728646,0.0002793028,0.0001484981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008338112,0.000248644,0.00006568433,0.001948806,0.0005685777,0.000157256,0.0003583192,0.001193429,0.000362983],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003044826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001137048,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6833596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03290328,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9940579,0.002530344,0.0005469535,0.0006857846,0.0006524352,0.001526608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983391,0.000306736,0.00007812281,0.0003729863,0.0001622615,0.0007408616],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006659125,0.003222823,0.3499241,0.0009831133,0.0001742011,0.005449646,0.4575848,4.636628e-7,0.00003126539,0.09583446,0.05117882,0.03495044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007808498,0.003995288,0.7499218,0.000007330183,0.00003419528,0.0004115069,0.1752676,0.0000299171,0.000001666133,0.04148789,0.02017016,0.0008642111],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8720585,0.0001682003,0.000001911405,0.1138187,0.00008391537,0.0009147374,0.0001064946,0.00007319167,0.01277438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853344,0.0000646942,0.000004286499,0.003183485,0.007440321,0.000106118,0.00001040864,0.00003926269,0.003817004],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6504563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999966,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.336648416659837,"score_gpt":0.5823920523546775,"score_spread":0.2457436356948405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}