{"id":"W3082385914","doi":"10.1002/cjs.11569","title":"A Gaussian alternative to using improper confidence intervals","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Statistics; Margin (machine learning); Bivariate analysis; Confidence interval; Gaussian; Coverage probability; Measure (data warehouse); Confidence distribution; Distribution (mathematics); Interpretation (philosophy); Applied mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Computer science; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003025008,0.00008942901,0.0002226958,0.0003297229,0.0001317995,0.0004612756,0.0006669824,0.00003544826,0.001963716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01335481,0.000066354,0.00005141334,0.000562612,0.00008546846,0.0002302534,0.00001912299,0.0001850964,0.0001813269],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001559292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001771989,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001656511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008538616,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973682,0.0001770974,0.000731079,0.0001930873,0.001304867,0.0002256736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958951,0.000244639,0.0004189009,0.0001477863,0.002056567,0.001236958],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002184857,0.00002747378,0.01849216,0.00002291176,0.000162545,0.0009510799,0.05564578,0.02615253,0.01948451,0.02746917,0.6963466,0.1550267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003240916,0.002907274,0.02964975,0.0006757447,0.0003325324,0.000317394,0.02409341,0.4984187,0.01008741,0.1664096,0.2623213,0.001546003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09268006,0.00007358453,0.8982636,0.005989984,0.001732624,0.0001695448,0.0002150217,0.000002341411,0.0008732124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736266,8.983988e-7,0.02374595,0.002140939,0.0002353919,3.993713e-7,0.000001215653,0.000006907054,0.0002417063],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8809465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989486,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4985297967382203,"score_gpt":0.4240791662214876,"score_spread":0.07445063051673273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}