{"id":"W3082599046","doi":"10.18592/al-banjari.v19i1.3517","title":"ETIKA ILMIAH ISLAM SEBAGAI WUJUD TOLERANSI (Analisis Pemikiran Taha Jabir al-Alwani dalam Kitab Adab al-Ikhtilafi fi al Islami)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AL-BANJARI Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-ilmu Keislaman","topic":"Education and Character Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Encana (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Islam; Sociology; Epistemology; Perspective (graphical); Media studies; Psychology; Philosophy; Theology; Law; Political science; Computer science; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002213949,0.001502136,0.001717796,0.0005769888,0.00264269,0.00139069,0.002689093,0.000733653,0.00512368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005998399,0.001568858,0.0009731438,0.002551893,0.001054862,0.001848683,0.000497295,0.002358845,0.001308497],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009428183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002753632,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002987639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003225196,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9878159,0.001123307,0.002360832,0.00242029,0.003405964,0.002873668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940892,0.0005175274,0.001141562,0.001338859,0.001056665,0.001856136],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003018432,0.0008184396,0.01505714,0.0001159085,0.0007467767,0.0002644881,0.1417769,0.00007777591,0.005506321,0.007526815,0.8052578,0.02254976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002151657,0.0003055473,0.0233348,0.0002474175,0.0002416052,0.00005193839,0.02360616,0.0002685912,0.001556406,0.0003699186,0.9458593,0.002006721],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5644733,0.0005050806,0.000279351,0.3378663,0.005018633,0.001565862,0.0001732055,0.0008917176,0.0892266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8666301,0.001996029,0.001634924,0.1146748,0.00254324,0.000168505,0.0004217454,0.0002848092,0.01164583],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3021568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999428,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03216689669356895,"score_gpt":0.3049676165305172,"score_spread":0.2728007198369482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}