{"id":"W3082697461","doi":"10.1093/condor/duaa039","title":"Tree Swallow selection for wetlands in agricultural landscapes predicted by central-place foraging theory","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ornithological Applications","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Habitat; Wetland; Foraging; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Biomass (ecology); Insectivore; Phalaris arundinacea; Land cover; Geography; Environmental science; Biology; Land use","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001082547,0.0000952382,0.0001148109,0.00001106537,0.0002065474,0.00001272651,0.0001212584,0.00008400288,0.0002428626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000657559,0.00006934511,0.00003607112,0.0002740356,0.00007389647,0.00007251416,0.00005097483,0.0001218671,0.00004725496],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004205391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000318329,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":9.412304e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002462376,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992536,0.00004319826,0.0001528129,0.0002700739,0.00006387795,0.0002164147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996465,0.0001774242,0.00005292103,0.0000470993,0.000009752556,0.00006625891],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008112824,0.0002200468,0.9693329,0.000012746,0.0000200687,5.439881e-7,0.0005348672,0.002481567,0.008783621,0.002480539,0.01191789,0.004134066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005518597,0.0001163961,0.97834,0.000002053745,0.0000214772,0.000003590701,0.0003228216,0.004094401,0.0002026662,0.003939861,0.01225005,0.000154801],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8630233,0.00004628587,0.1109902,0.01050198,0.00002924856,0.001391053,0.0001378033,0.0002446616,0.01363549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956285,0.00002063943,0.002253328,0.0006328456,0.00003327044,0.0008941055,0.0002090106,0.00000493335,0.0003233899],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1326052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2827812,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008044548544695692,"score_gpt":0.2173693611724602,"score_spread":0.2093248126277645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}