{"id":"W3082822271","doi":"10.1590/1678-9199-jvatitd-2019-0082","title":"Evaluating Journal Impact Factor: a systematic survey of the pros and cons, and overview of alternative measures","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Hamilton General Hospital; Impact; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Impact factor; Computer science; Ranking (information retrieval); Quality (philosophy); Data science; Information retrieval; Medical physics; Medicine; Library science; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006556868,0.0001502102,0.0007668805,0.001505218,0.0003272693,0.000585144,0.0008892889,0.00004267733,0.00002297876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02840518,0.00006323068,0.0001932435,0.006196121,0.0003914784,0.0002057715,0.0006275726,0.0002839193,3.324627e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004503434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003019377,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008596095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001967475,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9930778,0.001648375,0.00120462,0.0001955621,0.003641016,0.0002326324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894199,0.006191816,0.00156095,0.000186332,0.002192304,0.0004486696],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000442107,0.0001763372,0.9788979,0.0007731796,0.0002728355,0.00001481213,0.001045034,0.00006492609,0.004957097,0.0001758427,0.0001426151,0.01303736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006304746,0.001569737,0.9902207,0.000546402,0.000112144,0.0001089558,0.0003686398,0.004716993,0.0001397944,0.001495374,0.00001221571,0.00007851968],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9564078,0.0423126,0.0004810901,0.0003297997,0.00005895955,0.0002570675,0.0001434839,0.00000144777,0.000007735094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973913,0.002401393,0.00008438803,0.0000478783,0.0000640283,9.475592e-7,1.033085e-7,0.000007205229,0.000002693057],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04098355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9797789,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7686354890913598,"score_gpt":0.5833849753578085,"score_spread":0.1852505137335513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}