{"id":"W3083387357","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2020.08.021","title":"The CEEDER database of evidence reviews: An open-access evidence service for researchers and decision-makers","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Science & Policy","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Incentive; Transparency (behavior); Systematic review; Evidence-based practice; Reliability (semiconductor); Evidence-based policy; Resource (disambiguation); Service (business); Grey literature; Computer science; Knowledge management; Business; Management science; Political science; MEDLINE; Marketing; Economics; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04100455,0.003960093,0.02065072,0.1078422,0.001815637,0.0212356,0.007561838,0.009622422,0.1362519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3144291,0.003169781,0.005490321,0.1038973,0.002069512,0.009516582,0.0124992,0.005220234,0.03586098],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004479409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03217668,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004108343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006644074,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9344754,0.01453152,0.03570225,0.002837424,0.01071942,0.001734052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6127236,0.2151015,0.08290144,0.02286559,0.04851287,0.0178949],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001908996,0.0002930367,0.001702137,0.2794179,0.004438626,0.0002762402,0.0006225612,0.0005714754,0.001013201,0.01393124,0.4948525,0.2009721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004502836,0.000362022,0.007131464,0.1670683,0.009141089,0.000367238,0.0004525299,0.0008910698,0.0009043915,0.01485575,0.7938529,0.0004704366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.003313043,0.09086061,0.01729035,0.02266597,0.002747849,0.01465546,0.7997594,0.01280264,0.03590476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02249247,0.22224,0.1723636,0.01195128,0.003932544,0.04661999,0.4927419,0.00732314,0.02033504],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9924381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4558079,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7866679771554409,"score_gpt":0.65409991774004,"score_spread":0.132568059415401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}