{"id":"W3084304375","doi":"10.1002/mop.32929","title":"A partial element equivalent circuit‐metamodel combination for fast tolerance analysis of electromagnetic systems","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Microwave and Optical Technology Letters","topic":"Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Metamodeling; Partial element equivalent circuit; Equivalent circuit; Monte Carlo method; Finite element method; Computer science; Element (criminal law); Electronic engineering; Engineering; Mathematics; Electrical engineering; Structural engineering; Voltage","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004620791,0.0004985622,0.000581137,0.0004179312,0.0002156408,0.0004634696,0.00066323,0.0006151617,0.00229151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006534116,0.0002969209,0.0006240734,0.000301311,0.0002300323,0.00074583,0.000611391,0.0006724967,0.0004091946],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002214614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004134686,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005937503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008233151,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997234,0.00009587032,0.00001076173,0.00002609043,0.0001219536,0.0000219515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998106,0.00007812095,0.00001978344,0.00004442593,0.00003630929,0.00001071417],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006780167,0.00009029302,0.0004817203,0.0001089914,0.00008136868,0.0001375123,0.00006140695,0.7859675,0.06269043,0.04347446,0.000858822,0.1059797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002498632,0.00002011837,0.000031198,0.000002389444,0.000004672237,0.00001794187,0.000002043938,0.9952997,0.002176215,0.001575986,0.000864279,0.000002874542],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00574825,0.00003571145,0.9930717,0.00002456302,0.00001037907,0.00001273099,0.00001086356,0.00016569,0.0009200879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4970863,0.0001641352,0.4996211,0.00008147168,0.00003031303,0.000147006,0.0001020357,0.0001565214,0.002611245],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00229151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007665813,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04357800196664423,"score_gpt":0.2885980246656431,"score_spread":0.2450200226989989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}