{"id":"W3085345291","doi":"","title":"Geologic Evaluation of the Safford Basin for Carbon Dioxide Sequestration Potential","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)","topic":"CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Carbon sequestration; Geological survey; Fossil fuel; Environmental science; Structural basin; Earth science; Environmental protection; Carbon dioxide; Geology; Engineering; Waste management","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004710997,0.00006877879,0.00008177995,0.00001823719,0.0003042404,0.000004175683,0.0001975605,0.00006720701,0.0002213536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005237318,0.0000509708,0.0001047927,0.00008771573,0.0003259428,0.000161531,0.0000765066,0.00008024789,0.000005744209],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001673054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004478818,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001037918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001648556,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991262,0.0002033379,0.000123899,0.0001155312,0.0003080131,0.0001230047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993985,0.00005649152,0.0002217111,0.0002243476,0.00006882374,0.00003015779],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003512777,0.0005965858,0.3196836,0.00003385321,0.0001535778,0.000002982777,0.005657319,0.058843,0.6003548,0.004474163,0.003140269,0.006708635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008698052,0.0002519371,0.8808621,0.0000225969,0.0004995539,0.00006296295,0.002416148,0.02683952,0.07485446,0.001700292,0.01139075,0.0002298306],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9705086,0.00001385469,0.001063832,0.0005083595,0.0004922461,0.0003996076,0.000002919132,0.0000133681,0.02699725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974867,0.00000191187,0.000317096,0.00002422521,0.00004681584,0.000001406883,0.000005035184,0.000002550369,0.002114278],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5611786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2423667,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01324168723696243,"score_gpt":0.2150707894135854,"score_spread":0.201829102176623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}