{"id":"W3085345291","doi":"","title":"Geologic Evaluation of the Safford Basin for Carbon Dioxide Sequestration Potential","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)","topic":"CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Carbon sequestration; Geological survey; Fossil fuel; Environmental science; Structural basin; Earth science; Environmental protection; Carbon dioxide; Geology; Engineering; Waste management","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002810498,0.0002554405,0.000168629,0.00173907,0.001076243,0.0007439464,0.0004402699,0.0003080927,0.002540303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004555089,0.000149066,0.0001478472,0.001746876,0.0005682278,0.000613667,0.0003635273,0.0002716136,0.0001847204],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002734249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002226165,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3775474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6545252,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999774,0.00001864439,0.000006155443,0.00003404415,0.0001275825,0.00003953407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999685,0.00002701551,0.00002907158,0.00001179384,0.000217624,0.00002948155],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004033171,0.0001415872,0.8698895,0.0002347682,0.00009602772,0.0006367066,0.001439766,0.01684826,0.03058526,0.004407742,0.01002686,0.06529021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002799492,0.0001243715,0.953425,0.00006704024,0.00005667331,0.0001568138,0.002081658,0.01722602,0.01082461,0.0005296082,0.01545824,0.00002195193],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9774274,0.0004196282,0.000770664,0.0002217657,0.00001087997,0.00008430531,0.002068509,0.00004538736,0.01895153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958891,0.0002070593,0.001206944,0.00003132598,0.000005022602,0.00002411143,0.001111664,0.000007798612,0.001517038],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3775474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7506998,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01324168723696243,"score_gpt":0.2150707894135854,"score_spread":0.201829102176623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}