{"id":"W3087873071","doi":"10.1002/lno.11610","title":"Massive silicon utilization facilitated by a benthic‐pelagic coupled feedback sustains deep‐sea sponge aggregations","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Limnology and Oceanography","topic":"Marine Sponges and Natural Products","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Bedford Institute of Oceanography; Fisheries and Oceans Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Silicic acid; Biogenic silica; Sponge; Pelagic zone; Benthic zone; Diatom; Photic zone; Oceanography; Biogeochemical cycle; Population; Plankton; Geology; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology; Paleontology; Phytoplankton; Nutrient","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008167079,0.0002172366,0.0001986584,0.00008511068,0.000182102,0.00002369358,0.0001507678,0.0003196226,0.00006155139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001867418,0.0002050979,0.00009616533,0.0003879541,0.0002428508,0.00001207604,0.000128062,0.000213032,0.000008056469],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004486091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002857611,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009951072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004326383,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987497,0.00009182633,0.0002180677,0.000539176,0.00008909177,0.0003121565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993599,0.00002189868,0.00009981006,0.000214741,0.0001464634,0.000157177],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003335763,0.000673936,0.4901243,0.0006655157,0.001579996,0.00007215097,0.00278449,0.0002179989,0.4169773,0.004601635,0.05103916,0.02792772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01413968,0.009367697,0.2850273,0.00008629529,0.0007728757,0.0001347883,0.006982299,0.01969173,0.2720977,0.003395958,0.3842728,0.004030862],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9869497,0.007288367,0.0003745084,0.004578126,0.000109211,0.0003077927,0.00007194825,0.00005094478,0.0002693407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946094,0.002287763,0.00009535813,0.001349161,0.00009949739,0.000008756544,0.001293205,0.0000169545,0.0002399625],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3332336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8363649,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01301472818851286,"score_gpt":0.2317495139274834,"score_spread":0.2187347857389706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}