{"id":"W3087942109","doi":"10.1002/edn3.135","title":"Using environmental DNA for biomonitoring of freshwater fish communities: Comparison with established gillnet surveys in a boreal hydroelectric impoundment","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental DNA","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Hydro-Québec; GDG Environnement; Université Laval","funders":"EnGlobe; Mitacs; Hydro-Québec","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Abundance (ecology); Relative species abundance; Fishery; Species richness; Ecology; Freshwater fish; Biology; Environmental science; Biodiversity; Fish <Actinopterygii>","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007055586,0.0005001444,0.00023202,0.001519728,0.0005484024,0.0004413204,0.0005034388,0.0003427034,0.0004391039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001498793,0.0002263828,0.0001962414,0.0008360262,0.0006141687,0.000413271,0.0005912193,0.0002022478,0.0001268177],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006370215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004277715,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03281534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1082988,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991367,0.0001847626,0.00006123404,0.000328714,0.0002087635,0.00007982298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987627,0.0001607277,0.0004847819,0.00005873136,0.0003182681,0.0002147603],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009372134,0.00007836823,0.9753607,0.00002559278,0.00002803306,0.00009260756,0.0006087983,0.0001121489,0.01804533,0.00001222947,0.00002617368,0.005516345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002059704,0.0001524789,0.9983582,0.000002579903,0.000009357304,0.00006920345,0.0002715843,0.0002222347,0.000829985,0.00000368187,0.00007499587,0.000003601532],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992942,0.00003155271,0.0004135351,0.000006379816,0.000001793925,0.00001127892,0.0000748905,0.000004086802,0.0001623713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972173,0.00005223452,0.002142872,0.00001825768,0.000005501473,0.00002248724,0.0003027778,0.000003236303,0.0002353904],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03281534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06524867,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03260397586120575,"score_gpt":0.2340108886491891,"score_spread":0.2014069127879833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}