{"id":"W3088034357","doi":"10.3389/fvets.2020.00592","title":"In silico Evolutionary Divergence Analysis Suggests the Potentiality of Capsid Protein VP2 in Serotype-Independent Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus Detection","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Veterinary Science","topic":"Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Foot-and-mouth disease virus; Capsid; Serotype; Biology; Epitope; Virology; Conserved sequence; Phylogenetic tree; In silico; Antigenicity; Virus; Genetics; L1; Gene; Peptide sequence; Antibody","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007141193,0.0001156738,0.0002218955,0.0001131601,0.0001325357,0.00001925943,0.0004593541,0.00004186052,0.00003995547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002126333,0.00005445544,0.00007161467,0.002577324,0.0004182307,0.000322489,0.0003323441,0.0001266949,0.000002381987],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007172812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002358899,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001794523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006925316,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983824,0.0002650387,0.0002992029,0.000487202,0.0002692305,0.0002969325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996272,0.00003406182,0.0001003031,0.00008006732,0.00002575185,0.0001326639],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006300322,0.0001104893,0.8711761,0.00002768661,0.00001291688,0.0000560899,0.0002293097,0.000851841,0.1221439,0.0001232095,0.00003713402,0.004601317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009448735,0.0002409243,0.9821802,0.000009359499,0.00001867574,4.67591e-7,0.0004484926,0.0160259,0.0001051891,0.0006879775,0.00008336121,0.0001049524],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976183,0.0003168087,0.0001351052,0.001381189,0.0001114901,0.0003627592,0.00002381909,0.00001122684,0.0000393334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996014,0.00003898074,0.0001142907,0.000162817,0.00002606731,0.00003043491,0.000005608885,5.706711e-7,0.00001984288],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1220387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2712794,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02601741700404802,"score_gpt":0.2442422933868094,"score_spread":0.2182248763827614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}