{"id":"W3088053563","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.2009.13050","title":"Linear-Quadratic Mean Field Games with a Major Player: Nash certainty equivalence versus master equations","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Stochastic processes and financial applications","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Certainty; Equivalence (formal languages); Mathematics; Quadratic equation; Mathematical economics; Nash equilibrium; Applied mathematics; Calculus (dental); Mathematical optimization; Pure mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00318102,0.000913686,0.001015675,0.0005986551,0.0005967501,0.001797767,0.001174067,0.001622623,0.004953654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01035684,0.000319417,0.0007769975,0.0005344322,0.002437226,0.00394781,0.002566172,0.002406859,0.0003062901],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001454352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001058302,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001978326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001178032,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998293,0.0009060662,0.00005444005,0.0002568239,0.0003164424,0.0001733487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967199,0.002237114,0.0003878037,0.0001552759,0.0002666078,0.0002332605],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001601583,0.00001790361,0.0001450297,0.00002470513,0.00001034144,0.00003107216,0.00006890703,0.01687647,0.0002339138,0.9791947,0.0005112104,0.002869779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001650533,0.00002094711,0.0001105665,0.00001155317,0.000006996639,0.00002037044,0.0000339094,0.1412912,0.0001101732,0.8574462,0.0009207861,0.00001081792],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06559473,0.0008192289,0.8958451,0.003387391,0.0001187062,0.00007948668,0.00018729,0.00007138335,0.03389673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9427958,0.0008615491,0.04280566,0.0005252156,0.0002866779,0.0001932708,0.00009896218,0.00004511184,0.0123877],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004953654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01682305,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1452467736263058,"score_gpt":0.2056201719270224,"score_spread":0.06037339830071656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}