{"id":"W3088224047","doi":"10.29173/istl51","title":"Investigating Science Researchers’ Presence on Academic Profile Websites: A Case Study of a Canadian Research University","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Workflow; World Wide Web; Library science; Meaning (existential); Scholarly communication; Publishing; Computer science; Psychology; Political science; Database","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05750448,0.0001584431,0.00034607,0.183525,0.001662857,0.001348485,0.00866662,0.0002540762,0.00007405442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2150039,0.0001306149,0.00001968507,0.6151676,0.01347542,0.003029451,0.003472539,0.002019863,0.00007311009],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002860921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005881866,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0301209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008162551,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9844756,0.0006136844,0.0005887578,0.00184572,0.01090833,0.001567884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884253,0.004048959,0.0001751526,0.001228569,0.004505075,0.001616937],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002100555,0.0001465194,0.9277851,0.00001227521,0.000003372806,0.001817909,0.0132554,0.00001626158,0.007392779,0.02346952,0.002053946,0.0240259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002247001,0.006022593,0.1636326,0.0001960825,0.000006654446,0.0002967794,0.715049,0.03177613,0.02674817,0.03656674,0.01666421,0.0007940345],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9683268,0.000241388,0.000003634052,0.02212735,0.00006301602,0.0008015282,0.00001219478,0.00004201043,0.008382074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986781,0.0000827553,0.0008014775,0.0001002077,0.00002311299,0.000009433203,1.599992e-7,0.00000742504,0.000297329],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7641525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997538,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8119318843063014,"score_gpt":0.5884236921038694,"score_spread":0.223508192202432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}