{"id":"W3088514650","doi":"10.1016/j.jaging.2020.100877","title":"From invisible to extraordinary: Representations of older LGBTQ persons in Canadian print and online news media","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Aging Studies","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Newspaper; Mainstream; Gender studies; Queer; Social media; Thematic analysis; Ideology; Media studies; Prejudice (legal term); Extant taxon; Sociology; Lesbian; Psychology; Political science; Politics; Social psychology; Qualitative research; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001402345,0.000532905,0.0002708071,0.002875203,0.008279695,0.006075094,0.0007328035,0.0008819801,0.00296904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004989002,0.0002631783,0.0002110222,0.002348477,0.004771514,0.002523293,0.003473015,0.001349574,0.0001991736],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01166659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007176953,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7162928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8254969,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989842,0.0002312672,0.00003875123,0.00006782905,0.000370407,0.0003076703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997134,0.0008862237,0.0007766034,0.00009250484,0.0005483556,0.0005624001],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006569379,0.00001997313,0.02696152,0.00009044629,0.000008896065,0.0006518097,0.962392,0.00001372551,0.0005702834,0.0007621045,0.001099201,0.007364362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003091136,0.00002084704,0.03255681,0.0001445221,0.00001793839,0.0003819108,0.9538381,0.00003076101,0.0001517549,0.0001295258,0.01270657,0.0000180743],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9876626,0.0008761702,0.00009002807,0.0009055787,0.0000392544,0.00001523593,0.0001624668,0.000005550774,0.01024309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996803,0.0009845525,0.00009348053,0.0003597102,0.00002443134,0.000009564722,0.00008845724,0.000008186877,0.001628503],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2837072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.570756,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1023413540903307,"score_gpt":0.4400567115854478,"score_spread":0.3377153574951172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}