{"id":"W3088514650","doi":"10.1016/j.jaging.2020.100877","title":"From invisible to extraordinary: Representations of older LGBTQ persons in Canadian print and online news media","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Aging Studies","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Newspaper; Mainstream; Gender studies; Queer; Social media; Thematic analysis; Ideology; Media studies; Prejudice (legal term); Extant taxon; Sociology; Lesbian; Psychology; Political science; Politics; Social psychology; Qualitative research; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001726414,0.00008470546,0.0003111592,0.0003010465,0.00007216352,0.00001369955,0.0001150167,0.00003486724,0.00005421361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003462491,0.00007584802,0.00004720945,0.0002416909,0.0000571012,0.00008069826,0.00004857741,0.0002188112,0.000005365735],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007612057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001640244,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4698545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4840794,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990314,0.00008757842,0.0004074436,0.0001338717,0.0001212083,0.0002185411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991254,0.0001928306,0.0001701573,0.0001010548,0.0001049163,0.0003056478],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002142311,0.00005608876,0.7885535,0.00008993672,0.0001769758,0.0001075006,0.1557217,0.00001900279,0.00007622596,0.0001303202,0.0522395,0.002807861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006132723,0.0001125901,0.9575928,0.0000814277,0.00006977227,0.00001562052,0.03761696,0.000004011931,0.00000743804,0.0004835843,0.003325561,0.00007695202],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8822277,0.005801696,0.0000126481,0.1107287,0.0004044237,0.00008407731,0.00005218378,0.000003983639,0.0006845033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943978,0.001449909,0.001135245,0.001948695,0.0008203816,0.000002219798,0.000001930577,0.00001083876,0.0002329449],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1690394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5336758,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1023413540903307,"score_gpt":0.4400567115854478,"score_spread":0.3377153574951172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}