{"id":"W3088839583","doi":"10.1111/mec.15646","title":"Monitoring the ecological status of rivers with diatom eDNA metabarcoding: A comparison of taxonomic markers and analytical approaches for the inference of a molecular diatom index","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Molecular Ecology","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Cytodiagnostics (Canada)","funders":"European Regional Development Fund; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Diatom; Biology; Benchmark (surveying); Inference; Ecology; Taxonomy (biology); Computational biology; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001543726,0.0001449031,0.0003611182,0.00002106667,0.00009311419,0.000005571397,0.0003011209,0.00007191148,0.00003652388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001456177,0.00009256787,0.00008753154,0.0001355591,0.001543978,0.00003825218,0.0005501584,0.0001319612,0.000001827548],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006993745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009906239,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009065444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001716233,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998906,0.0001100691,0.0002442549,0.0002794396,0.000188319,0.000271891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990747,0.0004452939,0.0002159827,0.0001780207,0.000007125887,0.00007885111],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001392534,0.00009649379,0.9840053,0.0000229483,0.0002276676,0.00000335166,0.000519229,0.00951562,0.00433267,0.0001651817,0.00001824226,0.000954039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005574104,0.0005824774,0.9701046,0.000004117295,0.0002301201,6.982074e-7,0.001800341,0.01071257,0.01574413,0.00005285642,0.0001043322,0.0001063902],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936302,0.0002568535,0.005001748,0.0003962045,0.00001879508,0.0005324823,0.00002299807,0.000005258875,0.0001354814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959214,0.00007690376,0.003888629,0.00006592579,0.000003012755,0.00003458932,0.000001512599,0.000006643931,0.000001423033],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01390075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.568885,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04774199921532828,"score_gpt":0.24765777080723,"score_spread":0.1999157715919017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}