{"id":"W3088848087","doi":"10.1103/physrevd.103.063016","title":"Physical approach to the marginalization of LIGO calibration uncertainties","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physical review. D/Physical review. D.","topic":"Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Australian Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; California Institute of Technology; Massachusetts Institute of Technology; National Science Foundation","keywords":"LIGO; Calibration; Physics; Detector; Gravitational wave; Sky; Estimator; Neutron star; Computer science; Astrophysics; Optics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01369927,0.001717901,0.001548569,0.004159766,0.0009896797,0.004820837,0.003270042,0.001773952,0.003923325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03344567,0.00122367,0.002051814,0.002662967,0.004953332,0.00549892,0.003634684,0.003050158,0.0006062617],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003404403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002269789,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004346156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002323145,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9913352,0.004390473,0.0003203244,0.002101182,0.001519151,0.0003336428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842848,0.009327546,0.001723534,0.003408721,0.00105684,0.0001986441],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009559374,0.0000676292,0.0121694,0.0004010355,0.0007154095,0.0001875322,0.0004717982,0.0981928,0.001259706,0.8142313,0.00252386,0.06968385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003638944,0.00007815293,0.01068213,0.0001548646,0.0002283,0.0003614251,0.0001088966,0.1773596,0.002198394,0.7776144,0.03105403,0.0001233707],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01311623,0.002870622,0.9711349,0.001662657,0.0002361907,0.00005186483,0.0003424667,0.0004636996,0.01012139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7523376,0.004504798,0.2307687,0.001449323,0.00108775,0.000378012,0.0007325271,0.0005716507,0.008169612],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01369927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07244956,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02159810515979278,"score_gpt":0.4473083041193068,"score_spread":0.425710198959514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}