{"id":"W3089544298","doi":"10.1016/j.cageo.2020.104621","title":"A comparison of isometric and amalgamation logratio balances in compositional data analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computers & Geosciences","topic":"Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Compositional data; Transformation (genetics); Set (abstract data type); Pairwise comparison; Computer science; Data set; Variance (accounting); Domain (mathematical analysis); Contrast (vision); Mathematics; Algorithm; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Mathematical analysis; Accounting","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003565206,0.000094767,0.0002876711,0.0002797869,0.00008901006,0.0001274287,0.001434528,0.00003344881,0.00000698463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001006131,0.00008539262,0.00003179246,0.003890472,0.0001742767,0.0005526427,0.0006604034,0.00008046021,0.00000153039],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006475404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003827544,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004532343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002007818,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986201,0.00006271313,0.0003238785,0.0005279551,0.0002980062,0.0001673626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991816,0.0001710379,0.0001826342,0.0003242153,0.00006102143,0.00007945322],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007101336,0.000143312,0.9436359,0.00007138086,0.00006164554,0.000005976861,0.003417082,0.0232377,0.001472718,0.005810129,0.0006892123,0.02144777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001032859,0.00005783665,0.1754957,0.000009411251,0.00001273398,0.000001475685,0.0001246564,0.8230888,0.0002309424,0.0004236284,0.0003689966,0.00008257024],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1943369,0.0004015638,0.7982329,0.006390114,0.00009725372,0.00008204374,0.00000986082,0.00004162821,0.0004076872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9472256,0.00001048362,0.05248429,0.0002173243,0.00002095919,0.00000161038,0.00003488402,4.722024e-7,0.00000434217],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7998511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.348221,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06946208439208983,"score_gpt":0.3115562797541143,"score_spread":0.2420941953620244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}