{"id":"W3089648759","doi":"10.1177/0021998320960774","title":"Optimum design parameters and mechanical properties of polymeric nanocomposites using NSGA-II optimization method","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Composite Materials","topic":"Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Petroleum Technology Research Centre; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Materials science; Ultimate tensile strength; Nanocomposite; Composite material; Modulus; Work (physics); Polymer; Optimal design; Young's modulus; Computer science; Mechanical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001086934,0.00131085,0.0007600771,0.0009279334,0.0003368895,0.0006234245,0.0005640357,0.0009350628,0.001820979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001784351,0.0005934437,0.0009677643,0.0004759691,0.000419309,0.0003435809,0.0004731347,0.0008010899,0.0003101066],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006434164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001474177,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003027302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004624748,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996107,0.0001424363,0.00002192239,0.00005238901,0.0001199251,0.00005266733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995123,0.000308538,0.00005921574,0.00001506915,0.00009397,0.00001084993],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004041805,0.00005614123,0.000280795,0.0001544708,0.00002409626,0.0000345977,0.00004233368,0.9746646,0.005224036,0.001411153,0.0002370234,0.01783028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001164189,0.00005557394,0.000137467,0.00001497177,0.00001205903,0.000009632487,0.0000147785,0.9961472,0.002449909,0.0003519704,0.0007885286,0.000006305246],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06063679,0.0006282635,0.9312372,0.0001262765,0.00005334259,0.0002814886,0.00008650103,0.0004515513,0.006498585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.387942,0.0004094205,0.605803,0.00008907018,0.00001107398,0.001544393,0.0001702419,0.0001420079,0.003888988],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003027302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006091774,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06197811984965245,"score_gpt":0.2649519459239724,"score_spread":0.20297382607432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}